On the one hand, it’s a precariously (or perhaps preposterously) ambitious thing to do to try to work out finer details of Stonehenge and Giza at the same time; on the other hand, the two developing views may complement and illuminate one another as discoveries seem to begin happening at a sometimes almost alarming rate.
Some old discoveries return to light as well.
This may be hard to believe after I’ve gone on ad infinitum about Stonehenge being fairly well saturated with references to 1.067438159, but 1.066666666 is in there somewhere too.
1.066666666 x (Pi^2) = 1.052757803 and I will hopefully be able to explain momentarily why this is important, and
1.066666666 x (Pi^4) = 103.9030303 / 10^n, 103.9030303 being the standard value for the sarcen circle’s outer diameter in feet, based on an outer perimeter (circumference) of 120 Megalithic Yards of 2.720174976 feet. (For what it’s worth, 1.066666666 = 240 / 225, relating to the “B” version of the Venus Orbital Period, where the “A” version is 224.8373808.
As soon as we wonder why it’s not 1.067438159, we realize that 1.067438159 / 1.066666666 = 1.000723277 and discover the ever-important fine ratio 1.000723277 if we have not already become aware of it, and learn more about why the mathematics prefers multiple versions of planetary cycle values.
Recently I stumbled over some materials by Don Barone, I was rather impressed with the spirit and content of them even for being of a different school of thought, and I though adding Giza pyramid sides together was a rather creative and astute thing to attempt.
I tried it with my numbers, and for the Mycerinus and Chephren pyramids with respective baselength values fixed at 345.8499635 and 706.8583471 ft,
345.8499635 + 706.8583471 = 1052.7083106
That’s the recently noticed number we saw found in Stonehenge 1052.7083106, to an accuracy of
1.0527083106 / 1.052757803 = 0.9999529878, an uncommonly high level of accuracy
The difference between the Cheops and Chephren Pyramids is my standard model, which mainly uses Munck’s Giza data
754.5275745 – 706.8583471 = 47.669227400
That’s another number recently reckoned as being important, 47.66008749, to an acceptable accuracy of 47.66008749 / 47.669227400 = 0.99980826393.
One reason 47.66008749 has become recognized as important is because it’s up top in a very important 2 Pi series
47.66008749 / (2 Pi^1) = 758.5338512, proposed platform length Great Pyramid
47.66008749 / (2 Pi^3) = 192.3188691, the lost metrological unit known only as the “Ellifino”
47.66008749 / (2 Pi^4) = inner sarcen circle circumference of Stonehenge / 10^n
and etc, further down through an impressive series, also including two particularly powerful data retrieval tools, sqrt 60 and 2 / 1.622311470.
Also worth pointing out, the combined sidelengths of the Mycerinus and Cheops pyramids amounts to 754.5275745 + 345.8499635 = 1100.377538 which is 1000 x 1.100874629, my favorite candidate for the main absolute value of the Indus foot, to an above standard accuracy of 1.100377538 / 1.100874629 = .999548457
Their difference, 754.5275745 – 345.8499635 = 408.677611, approximates the simple multiple of the “Mayan” wonder number 1.021521080, 1.021521080 x 4 = 4.08608432, to an acceptable accuracy of 4.08608432 / 408.677611 = .99983072476.
I should probably also note that the proposed 7200 Pi = 22619.46711 inch East-West distance between Cheops’ and Mycerinus’ pyramids, might perhaps be seen as a macrocosm of part of the Great Pyramid’s interior, given that Petrie gives for the length of the Queen’s Chamber a value of 18.87250000 ft, which is likely enough to turn out 18.84955592 ft = 226.1946711 inches, in spite of some obvious and widespread temptation to take it to be “11 cubits” (~18.92 feet, depending on our idea of a cubit).
Getting back to 1.052757802, it has some interesting aliases, and it may be a metrological unit in its own right, given that it’s situated like one.
Upon further inquiry, it seems to have appeared as an estimated “1.052960599” several years ago in the midst of my experiments with different metrological units, applying the sqrt 2, sqrt 3, and sqrt 5 values of the Vesica Piscis geometry, wherein it’s also pointed out that it appears to be 1/2 of some type of Palestine Cubit.
1.052757802 x 2 = 2.105515604, a variation on the Palestine Cubit with possible geodetic value, and one which may have already been found in at least one Egyptian pyramidion as the particular diagonal to a rectangle measuring 1 Remen by 1 Royal Cubit.
Many if not all of the pyramidia considered so far seem to put a very clear focus on metrological units that way, sometimes rearranging them in creative ways.
As with my favorite Palestine Cubit 2.107038475 ft, which is linked to the “A” value for the half Venus Cycle by the equation 4 / x = VC/2, 2.105515604 is also linked to a primary half Venus Cycle value, the “B” value, by the same equation.
I haven’t unravelled all of it yet, but I am indeed indebted to Don Barone for inspiration here that has led to some rather interesting results.
Postscript/Addendum:
Perhaps looking at the ratios between the parts of this design as described by Petrie could offer a little additional guidance?
The ratio between 36857.7 (center of Cheops to center of Mycerinus, direct) and 17873.2 (center of Chephren to center of Mycerinus, direct) is 36857.7 / 17873.2 = 2.062176891, compare to Royal Cubit in inches / 10 = 2.062648062
The ratio between 22616.0 (Cheops to Mycerinus, East-West) and 13165.8 (Cheops to Chephren East-West) is 1.717783955, compare to Royal Cubit in feet, 20.62648062 inches / 12 = 1.718873385 ft
Royal Cubit, in feet, as ratio as well as actual measure. Quite impressive. Well done, ancient architects!
That is already what I get, by the way, for having chosen 72 x Pi x 10^n inches as the possible distance from Cheops to Mycerinus East-West and 13159.47254 inches as the possible distance from Cheops to Chephren East-West: 22619.46711 / 13159.47254 = 1.718873385
36857.7 / 19168.4 = 1.922836543 and
29102 / 15170.4 = 1.91834098
We appear to be near to the realm of reciprocals of various ways of representing the number 52, half Venus cycle / Pi^n, and the fierce and dreaded Ellifino
Also a curious thing, 22616.0 / 94502 looks at first glance much like the reciprocal of sqrt 174960 (486 x 360 = 6^5 x 225), while the number 36857.7 resembles 174960 / 10^n Palestine Cubits.
29102 / 13931.6 = 2.088920153, just below some possible Palestine Cubits on the low side, 2.091411128 being the one formed from Royal Cubit 1.718873385 x Remen 1.216733603 = 2.09141128 ft = 25.09693353 in.
Lastly, 19168.4 / 17873.2 = 1.072466039, which certainly reminds me of a very important 1.073519416.
Maybe it will get sorted out somehow exactly what this most mysterious 29102 is supposed to represent?
–Luke Piwalker
Luke Piwalker 