As of this hour, I’ve gotten two blog posts off the ground about the granite box that I’m fairly well pleased with.
I didn’t manage to touch on everything, though, so a bit of addendum might be in order if I can get organized.
Going back to this diagram for a moment, we can add some additional observations
It has now been observed that 51.25545268 inches x 2 = 102.5109054, where one of the Tikal Wonder Numbers is 102.5135530, which may or may not be an upgrade to the previous speculative reference to the value in feet of 51.25545268 / 12 = 4.271287732 ft possibly meaning 5 / 1.177245771 = 4.247201496, which could be taking slight liberty with the data.
For the diagonal 49.0528113 in / 12 = 4.091273428, there are some legitimate figures in this range that may be waiting to be found. For example the “Best Lunar Month” 29.52390320 x (1.177245771^2) = 4.901740198 x 10^n; 1944/10^n Palestinian Cubits = 4.096082797, and etc.
It is sort of a strange area because it seems to touch on another place where the vision of grand mathematical harmony was dampened by mathematical reality. The value in feet is near to the square roots of an obvious derivative of the Sacred Cubit 1.673128806 or of the Egyptian Mystery Number 1.676727943 (4.091273428^2 = 16.73851826; 4.096082797^2 = 16.77789428) and exactly how the ancients made the best of that may remain an open question for now.
For 49.7406885 in / 12 = 4.1450573375 ft, a number of mathematical probes have come back with the number 4.150573750 ((38880 x 1.0674238159) / 10^n).
If not already suggested, the diagonal of 47.03122474 in could be in Megalithic Feet (4 x 1.177245771 = 47.08983084)
Returning to this diagram,
For the figure 9.154624675 ft, it has been observed that 1.177245771 x 7776 = 9.154263115 x 10^n.
Regarding the figure 7.483940225 ft, which may be a measure repeated in the coffers attributed to Cheops and Chephren as well as appearing here, as before it attempts to retain its status as an almost uniquely enigmatic number.
As soon as the mathematical probes begin, the raw figure spreads out in all directions like oil on water.
Once again it only takes about five minutes to end up with
7.483901067 (54 x (1.177245771^2)) / 10^n
7.486429035 (10.37549896 / (1.177245771^2))
7.481018182 (surprising relationships to 51.95151515^n including 51.95151515 x 144 = 7481.018182)
7.494579344 (8 / Hashimi Cubit or .0333333333 Petrie Stonehenge Units)
And possibly others, with nothing particularly outstanding about any of them recognized yet, and probably still too little known about their metrological identities.
Thus we may have reached the stage with our inquiry where it’s time to examine the mathematical relationships between our best candidates for the identities of individual parts to try to determine if they do indeed represent a harmonious and deliberate looking assembly.
This can be a time-consuming process; there are generally more numbers in these coffers than in the exterior of a pyramid, and some of the mathematical properties of exterior pyramid measures are still under investigation, and even when we have managed to deduce what may be the original numbers, sometimes it’s waited on additional discoveries to be able to understand all of the reasons we are seeing these numbers.
–Luke Piwalker
Luke Piwalker 