While the subject of 1.423799334 and 1.424280286 is fresh in my mind…
At Stonehenge this past year or so, I discovered a third set of planetary, solar and and lunar calendar values. Before that there were only two sets, but as I began to see more about the metrological units that Stonehenge uses and how they were used there, gaining more respect for the “authoritity” of these numbers, it became clear that that I should take what I was seeing seriously and that therefore there was probably a third major set of calendar values.
Here is one of the ways we can generate the third or “C” value for the Venus Orbital Period from major metrological units associated with Stonehenge:
Palestinian Cubit 2.107038476 x Hashimi Cubit 1.067438159 = 224.9133272 / 100. 224.9133272 = Venus Orbital Period C
From there, we following the 1 / (Pi^2 x 12) link to the Half Venus Cycle (HVC) to find the HVC C value of 224.9133272 x (1 / (Pi^2 x 12)) = 18990.40377.
I soon found out that Giza had known about this all along, but I had never thought to ask in the right context. All one has to do is multiply the Great Pyramid’s perimeter length in feet by (2 Pi) – and what could be more obvious since from my perspective the Great Pyramid is first and foremost a model 2 Pi since that is its perimeter/height ratio – with the understanding that yes, there really and truly were probably more than two sets of calendar values observed and used by ancient people, and that that is what we are seeing.
Finding the three major Half Venus Cycle (Calendar Round) values in the Great Pyramid.
In retrospect, I probably missed a good chance back at Tikal, where my Mayan studies started, to recognize that there were at least 3 valid sets of calendar numbers, and this is because
1.424280286 x (4/3) = 1.424280286 x 1.333333333) = Half Venus Cycle C value 18990.40381 / 10000
Thus the two numbers that the latest tale is about have a simple and direct connection to the almighty Half Venus Cycle aka Calendar Round that coordinates ancient calendar systems. While the idea of ancient Egyptians or ancient British observing the Mayan Calendar may inspire controversy or dissent among some, the Mayan calendar is undeniably built on just such considerations.
All that any ancient culture really has to be on the same page with the Maya is to take a calendar just like the one we currently use where 365 days are divided into roughly 52 weeks of 7 days and also multiply the 365 days in a year by 52 by get the Half Venus Cycle of roughly 365 x 52 = 18980.
Accordingly, our Faiyum number 1.423799334 x (4/3) = 1.423799334 x 1.333333333 = 18983.99112 / 10000, and 18983.99112 is Half Venus Cycle A.
This may tell us that we might except a third such number related in the same way to Half Venus Cycle B.
Half Venus Cycle B 18997.72194 / (4.3) / 10^n = 1.424829146.
For now we will ignore this new discovery while we learn more about 1.424280286 and 1.423799334.
In the previous post, we looked at some of the series formed from our two numbers under discussion, 1.424280286 and 1.423799334, when combined with some of the more powerful and better known data retrieval tools like 2 Pi, Pi / 3, 1.177245771, 1.622311470 and square root 60 (or 1 / sqrt 60).
As often mentioned, the two most powerful data retrieval keys known thus far are square root 60 (or 1 / sqrt 60), followed by 2 / 1.622311470.
If we apply 2 / 1.622311470 = 1.232808888 to our two numbers under discussion, we find they are both linked to one another via exponential application of 2 / 1.622311470 = 1.232808888.
In addition to any important numbers appearing in the (2 / 1.622311470)^2 series formed, we can observe for ourselves that 1.423799344 / (2 / 1.622311470)^11 = 1.424280286 / 10^n, so we can say this pair of numbers has that extremely important value built into their relationship.
Another way of looking at this is simply as 1.424280286 / 1.423799344 = 1.000337788
So now we know that the annoying ratio 1.000337788 that fouls up many an otherwise perfect mathematical scheme, is actually the prestigious (2 / 1.622311470)^11 / (10^n).
1.000337788 also happens to be the ratio between the “Alternate e'” Megalithic Yard of 2.720174976 ft, and the “Incidental” Megalithic Yard of 2.719256444 ft.
As mentioned in the preceding post, the relationship between these premiere linear Megalithic Yard values is the ratio (Pi / 6), so we can develop the formula
(Megalithic Yard / (Pi / 6)) x 1.3333333333 = Half Venus Cycle / 10^n
Interestingly, to use this formula to generate the important Half Venus Cycle B value, requires as input the Draconic Megalithic Yard of 2.721223218 ft, a near perfect representation of 1/10th of the Draconic Month in days (textbook value Draconic Month = 27.212220815 days).
So with further study, we begin to get an even better idea of why both 1.424280286 and 1.423799344 were so important that we should indeed find them prominently featured in ancient architectural proportions, and we even begin to learn that there may be additional important numbers that are similar, and why they might be important.
Since discussion of the Megalithic Yard has been added here to a discussion that is largely about Palestinian Cubits that has been something of a thread running through the last few posts concerning the Faiyum Oasis and etc, let’s go back and take a look at the relationship between the Megalithic Yard and Palestinian Cubit.
Using the primary values,
AEMY 2.720174976 / Palestinian Cubit 2.107038476 = 1.290994449 = 1 / (sqrt 60). Simply by coexisting, these two ideal unit values generate as the ratio the most powerful mathematical probe known (which can also be seen metrologically as a value in Egyptian Sacred Cubits: ESC 2.091411007 / 1.290994449 = 1.620000000)
1.290994449 is equal to (sqrt 5) / (sqrt 3) precisely.
Thus we might expect that this value should link a number of Palestian Cubit values to a numer of Megalithic Yard values
AEMY 2.720174976 / 1.290994449 = 2.107038476 = 57.29577951 / 2.719256444 / 10
IMY 2.719256444 / 1.290994449 = 2.106326984 = 57.29577951 / 2.720174976 / 10
DMY 2.721223218 / 1.290994449 = 2.107850441 = 57.29577951 / 2.718208958 / 10
MFMY 2.718208958 / 1.290994449 = 2.015515605 = 57.29577951 / 2.721223218 / 10
This seems to reaffirm the two most recent additions to the linear Megalithic Yard family, the Draconic Megalithic Yard (DMY) and the “Megalithic Foot Megalithic Yard” (MFMY), which is generated from 32 / Megalithic Foot 1.177245771 / 10, so it is actually a value in Megalithic Feet rather than in Megalithic Yards, yet as a Megalithic Yard, it is the unit of a circle’s diameter when the circumference of the circles is in Hashimi Cubits = Egyptian Royal Feet.
It covers the three primary Palestianian Cubit values 2.107038476, 2.106326984, and 2.015515605 while casting a vote that there is a fourth important Palestinian Cubit Value we should know, 2.107850441. I wasn’t so sure of that until I looked at it this way.
This in turn may also cast a vote for the legitimacy of a fourth set of calendar values, because the formula 4 / Palestinian Cubit = Half Venus Cycle / 10^n was discovered some time after the present inquiry into the association between astronomy and metrology began.
One way of framing all this seems to be to say that the Egyptian Sacred Cubit links the Megalithic Yard to the Half Venus Cycle.
There is another potential formula that comes to mind (there are many formulas that should help simplify all of this) that is not known well enough to tell if it is truly useful, but it is
Palestinian Cubit x 24 = Venus Orbital Period^2 / 10^n
The formula is somewhat unstable because it generates some figures for the squared VOP that do not have true valid square roots and instead these squared VOP figures may have to be generated using assorted VOP figures in false square root pairs to match what is generated by using the Palestinian Cubit as the starting point. The first formula actually works without having to use a false square root pair. Simply,
VOP A^2 = 224.8373808^2 = 2.016326992 x 10^n
From there it looks like (VOP A x VOP C) / 24 = 2.107038475 x 10^n; (VOP A x VOP B) / 24 = 2.107850445.
The forth formula relating to a Palestinian Cubit value of 2.015515605 ft is probably not yet understood in this context.
At any rate, if these Venus Orbital Period formulas (which relate also to the proportions of the Great Pyramid’s King and Queen’s chambers) are valid, they may lend additional legitimacy to 2.107850441 as a fourth Palestinian Cubit value, which has long been suspected but never quite expected, if that makes sense.
We will hopefully hear more about 2.107850441 and hopefully I will be able to review the history of why and how I’ve encountered it before on a number of occasions.
For now, the discussion of 1.290994449 seems to have stimulated a new discovery, that of a reversing metrological 2 Pi chain. This comes from noticing that 1.290994449 (in Egyptian Sacred Cubits = Thom Mid Clyth Quantum) times 2 Pi is a figure in Remens, and 1.290994449 divided by 2 Pi is a figure in (inverse) Remens, and the progression continues onward in either direction of the known series of metrological units linked to the Remen through 2 Pi and or circles (circumference / radius = 2 Pi), i.e., Megalithic Foot, Egyptian Royal Foot (Hashimi Cubit) and etc. as described here.
Would all of this perhaps be part of why the Palestinian Cubit might have come into greater prominence, in at least the Faiyum Oasis but perhaps elsewhere as well in Egypt, in later Egyptian Dynasties?
Cheers and Happy New Year!
–Luke Piwalker
Luke Piwalker 