More About Stonehenge, Pt 8

Let me try to retrace my steps to get to what was supposed to have been the point of the previous post in this series, and go back to where I was just before the train seemingly took leave of its track. I was observing that potential Eclipse Year candidate 346.4769015 / 225 = 1Continue reading “More About Stonehenge, Pt 8”

More About Stonehenge, Pt 7

Hmmm… Perhaps there’s only enough to say here that it could have been a postscript at the end of the last post, but enough was probably said there, so this could end up a short post. Several things I could swear I started catching glimpses of 1. Stonehenge beginning to make statements about alternative setsContinue reading “More About Stonehenge, Pt 7”

Scrutinizing Stonehenge

This may be hard to explain, so please bear with me here. Having Stonehenge seemingly volunteer data on the Eclipse Year, I’m wanting to take stock of just how much planetary data we have already seen it expressing, and I’d like to see how it might express whatever is missing for that list. One problemContinue reading “Scrutinizing Stonehenge”

Some Random Weirdness

I often like to let the numbers steer a conversation although that may make it more difficult for some to follow the logic, but the logic of it is exploring relationships between numbers and particularly those which allow certain numbers to be grouped in informative ways – in ways that store the most data withinContinue reading “Some Random Weirdness”

Some Half-Baked Stonehengery

Just in case there’s anyone following this blog but not my postings to the GHMB, this is something I wrote there today. Some of it is part of my posting here on Asian pyramids, but the questions continue to try to embrace new concerns, which most recently include new work on Stonehenge and the questionContinue reading “Some Half-Baked Stonehengery”

Apologies…

Back when I was an avid patron of science publications, I often heard scientists comment about how scientists were like blindfolded men examining an elephant. One grabs its leg and declares it’s a tree, another grabs its trunk and declares it’s a snake, and so forth… Not a good way to start the New Year,Continue reading “Apologies…”

The Interpretive Use of Royal Cubits and the Mysteries of Chephren

I come to an interesting place in my adventures with ancient architecture and metrology, where I’m seemingly asked to give up my beliefs without actually giving them up. It may not be a difficult choice, but it does seem something of a strange one. Have I gotten lost? How did I get to such aContinue reading “The Interpretive Use of Royal Cubits and the Mysteries of Chephren”

What Else Is New?

On the one hand, it’s a precariously (or perhaps preposterously) ambitious thing to do to try to work out finer details of Stonehenge and Giza at the same time; on the other hand, the two developing views may complement and illuminate one another as discoveries seem to begin happening at a sometimes almost alarming rate.Continue reading “What Else Is New?”

What’s New? (Petrie’s Pyramid Rectangles, Pt 1)

Happy New Year! I hope 2020 is kinder to us all than the past year has been to many of us. I’d love to start the New Year off with a bang with some new discoveries, but I think I’ve nearly bitten off more than I can chew. Probably not a smart thing to doContinue reading “What’s New? (Petrie’s Pyramid Rectangles, Pt 1)”

More About Stonehenge, Pt 6

Something I should mention is that in interpreting Prof. Thom’s “17 Megalithic Yard” diameter for the inner Trilithon ellipse and the inner bluestone circle as 2 / 1.177245771 = 16.98880598 Megalithic Yards is that 16.98880598 x 2 Pi = 106.7438159, one of the numbers that Stonehenge seems quite fond of talking about, achieved this timeContinue reading “More About Stonehenge, Pt 6”

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started