Stonehenge seems to have pointed us in the direction of a third value for representing the half Venus Cycle (it’s nearly twice as accurate as the standard “B” value for the half Venus Cycle, adding about 10 days as opposed to about 17), and it looks like it may be mathematically compatible with its environment.Continue reading “Uncharted Skies?”
Tag Archives: Michael Morton
Rio Bec, Slight Return
Aside from Tikal, I’m not sure there any ancient American archaeological sites that have given me a sense of wonder and inspiration quite the way that Rio Bec, the namesake of the Rio Bec archaeological style, has. That was all any archaeologists had to say to me was to propose that the stately false towerContinue reading “Rio Bec, Slight Return”
Scrutinizing Stonehenge 2
I don’t imagine I yet have enough additional material on Stonehenge for another part in the series yet, but in case I have anything new to say on the subject in the meantime, let’s see what I can make out of another post. With the rapid influx of Stonehenge data lately, I’ve begun building aContinue reading “Scrutinizing Stonehenge 2”
More About Stonehenge, Pt 11
MORE AUBREY CENTER DISPLACEMENT EXPERIMENTS In Part 9 of this series, we looked the effect of the Aubrey Center displacement on the proportioning of the mean Trilithon “horseshoe” ellipse along its major axis (major diameter), and the we took a look at is effect on the proportioning of the outer bluestone circle. For the meanContinue reading “More About Stonehenge, Pt 11”
More About Stonehenge, Pt 10
Yeah, ten parts and we haven’t covered the half of it yet… What does that suggest about what Stonehenge is? What now? I bet we’re all very curious now what the Aubrey Center offset does to the message of the sarcen circle, I know I certainly am – but we can get back to thatContinue reading “More About Stonehenge, Pt 10”
More About Stonehenge, Pt 9
EXCERPTS FROM THE AUBREY EXPERIMENTS In case it had something to offer us, yesterday I experimented with trying to figure out what the point might be of the Aubrey Center being off-centered. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen anyone give an accounting for that and it seems like a very strange thing without someContinue reading “More About Stonehenge, Pt 9”
More About Stonehenge, Pt 8
Let me try to retrace my steps to get to what was supposed to have been the point of the previous post in this series, and go back to where I was just before the train seemingly took leave of its track. I was observing that potential Eclipse Year candidate 346.4769015 / 225 = 1Continue reading “More About Stonehenge, Pt 8”
More About Stonehenge, Pt 7
Hmmm… Perhaps there’s only enough to say here that it could have been a postscript at the end of the last post, but enough was probably said there, so this could end up a short post. Several things I could swear I started catching glimpses of 1. Stonehenge beginning to make statements about alternative setsContinue reading “More About Stonehenge, Pt 7”
Scrutinizing Stonehenge
This may be hard to explain, so please bear with me here. Having Stonehenge seemingly volunteer data on the Eclipse Year, I’m wanting to take stock of just how much planetary data we have already seen it expressing, and I’d like to see how it might express whatever is missing for that list. One problemContinue reading “Scrutinizing Stonehenge”
Some Random Weirdness
I often like to let the numbers steer a conversation although that may make it more difficult for some to follow the logic, but the logic of it is exploring relationships between numbers and particularly those which allow certain numbers to be grouped in informative ways – in ways that store the most data withinContinue reading “Some Random Weirdness”
Luke Piwalker 